The hedgehog was engaged in a fight with

Read More

Global Compact on Migration should be focused on maximizing its benefits for everyone

A deal to tackle refugees and migrants across the globe that the UN General Assembly adopted adopted in September was widely hailed by the United Nations as nothing short of a miraculous event. It is, however, threatened sometimes by today’s shifting and ever-changing political environment.

In the year, UN members are conducting discussions on the elements of international cooperation as well as governance of migration as part of the creation of the Global Compact for Secure, Regular, and Orderly Migration.

Between May 22 and June 23, the delegates will be focusing their attention on the current state of information and best practices on how to address the “drivers of migration.” This includes climate changes, natural disasters, and human-caused crises.

It is now the right moment to rethink outdated notions of human mobility instead of a more holistic, more nuanced, and comprehensive view of how people move and their interactions with rapidly changing economic and environmental conditions.

Migration drivers that are simple to understand

Discussions in international forums often focus on the aid for development as an integral component of the management of migration. This is due to its ability to decrease those who are referred to as ” root causes of migration” or the drivers behind it.

The professionals who work in migration have been lured by the notion that there is a ” migration hump.” This suggests that emigration could increase in the near term as economic growth picks up and more households acquire the financial resources required to move. However, it will eventually level off when economic growth allows families to stay at home or even return.

This theory is employed to explain why significant migration flows to Mexico towards the US increased slightly in the mid-90s after NAFTA’s signing NAFTA; however, it is now negative in flow.

If it seems too easy for it to be real, it’s due to the fact that it’s. A variety of social variables, including household goals as well as individual traits, affect the choice to migrate. In some instances, economic migrants are portrayed as naive individuals with a perfect understanding of income disparities, embodied in the metaphorical Homoeconomicus mocked by social researchers.

The UN is currently working on a plan to deal with the refugee and migrant crisis in the world. Antonio Parrinello/Reuters

Whatever the reason, the fact is that migration is an effective option to diversify household income sources and build a buffer against the possibility of future shocks. In the context of shifting climate, the need for mobility becomes particularly essential for households dependent on livelihoods based on resources.

These are the families that are not able to access sufficient financial assets, trade, and credit. If proper conditions are in place, the migration process can bring significant advantages for those who migrate and their families as well as their communities of origin as well as of the destination.

Development and Remittances

In order to build resilient communities and families, those with low skills and low incomes should not be neglected. A brand new study of comparative studies is a major element to the growing collection of studies on the role of migration in households to adjust to the ever-changing environment.

Through research conducted in six countries, namely the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Kenya, Mauritius, Papua New Guinea, and Vietnam, The study proves that the migration of people from dangerous environments is a win-win for everyone.

While there are significant differences between the six nations, the funds transferred by family members to other countries can be a substantial source of revenue.

The families with the lower 20% of income were the most dependent on cash remittances. They are also among the households with the lowest levels of land ownership, education, and access to credit in the form of formal loans. The potential to fund a family member’s move to another country is, therefore, important. And the rewards could be huge.

Households that receive remittances enjoy more income in the long term and medium term. This is because the money they receive increases their capacity to go beyond the necessities and invest in the improvement of their structures as income-generating assets.

Remittances were utilized for long-term resilience-building efforts like improving education, housing, and health services. If households are able to provide their basic needs for shelter and food and shelter, their capacity to invest grows.


Author Image
Jane S. King

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *